Skip to main content

Process diagnosis

Process diagnosis and redesign for companies

You don't need to know what to automate before talking to us. We enter your operation, understand how it works today, and detect where time, money or capacity is being lost. Before choosing a tool, it's worth understanding the process.

Tell us how your process works today

Where to start

First the process, then the technology

Choosing a tool without understanding the process usually ends in a solution that doesn't fit the real operation. That's why we start by understanding how your company works today: what gets done, who does it, with which systems, and where time or money is lost.

From that diagnosis, we define what's worth solving first and what kind of solution makes the most sense: organizing the flow, automating, integrating systems, or adding artificial intelligence.

The journey

AS-IS → Diagnosis → TO-BE

How it works today

We map the real process: actors, tasks, systems, data and decisions.

Where it's lost

We detect where time, money or capacity is lost.

How it should work

We design the future process and the most convenient technical approach.

AS-IS

How we understand the current process

We map the process as it works today, without assuming it's already organized. This lets us see the real starting point before proposing changes.

01
ActorsWho participates in each stage and what role they play.
02
TasksWhat gets done, in what order, and how much depends on manual work.
03
SystemsWhich tools are used and which don't communicate with each other.
04
DataWhat information is handled, where it lives, and how it's updated.
05
DecisionsWho decides, with what criteria, and what information they need.
06
Rules and exceptionsWhich rules are followed and which cases are resolved outside them.
07
LossesWhere time is lost, tasks are duplicated, or errors are generated.

TO-BE

How we design the future process

With the diagnosis in hand, we design how the process should work to solve the detected problems, without losing what already works well.

01
PrioritiesWhat's worth solving first based on impact and effort.
02
Future processHow the work should flow once redesigned.
03
ControlsWhich validations and checkpoints prevent errors.
04
IntegrationsWhich systems should connect and what information to share.
05
RolesWho does what in the new process and what changes for the team.
06
AdoptionHow the team is supported so the change sticks.

Methodology

An adaptable methodology, not a rigid process

These steps describe how we usually work, but each diagnosis adapts to the context. Not every diagnosis has exactly the same stages, nor always delivers the same document, nor always requires a long audit.

01
Context and goalWe understand what you want to achieve and what concerns you.
02
Survey the operationWe talk to the people who operate the process every day.
03
Review systems and dataWe see which tools are used and what information they handle.
04
Rebuild the AS-ISWe map how the process works today.
05
Identify problems and opportunitiesWe detect where time, money or capacity is lost.
06
Validate with the teamWe confirm that what we understood matches reality.
07
PrioritizeWe order opportunities by impact and effort.
08
Design the recommendationWe define the TO-BE and the most convenient technical approach.

What the company receives

What the company receives at the end of the diagnosis

The diagnosis isn't a generic report. It's a concrete basis for deciding with good judgment what to do and in what order.

01Map of the current process and its critical points
02Opportunities prioritized by impact and effort
03A well-founded recommendation on the technical approach
04Proposed implementation scope
05Clear next steps to move forward

What it is not

The diagnosis is not about finding where to put AI

We don't start from the technology, but from the problem. The diagnosis can end in AI, automation, traditional software, integration, a process change, or a combination. And if you already know what you need, we can assess and build directly, without going through a diagnosis.

In practice

What it looks like in real cases

Some examples of how understanding the process became a concrete solution.

SEPECO

Manually auditing calls was slow and subjective. We understood the process and built a system that transcribes, analyzes and classifies calls automatically.

SDP Holding

Cash flow consolidation required manual loading from different sources. We understood the flow and built an automation that processes the reports and delivers them organized to the final Excel.

See all cases

When it makes sense

When a process diagnosis makes sense

It makes sense when the process involves several systems, people or steps, and the problems can't be solved with just a new tool.

ERP and CRM01
WhatsApp and support channels02
Approvals and controls03
Reports and data consolidation04
Data loading and validation05
Customer support06
High-volume processes07

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions about process diagnosis

What's the difference between a diagnosis and an implementation?

+

The diagnosis is the previous stage: we understand the process, detect problems, and define what's worth doing. The implementation is the next stage, where the agreed solution is built. They can be done separately or as part of the same project.

Do I need to know which technology I want before starting?

+

No. In fact, it's better not to commit to a tool before understanding the process. The diagnosis helps you decide with good judgment whether to organize the flow, automate, integrate systems, or add AI.

How much does my team participate in the diagnosis?

+

The team that works on the process is the main source of information. We run interviews and survey how work is done today, because no one knows the process better than the people who operate it every day.

Is the diagnosis useful even if the process is already digitalized?

+

Yes. Often the problem isn't the lack of systems, but that systems don't communicate, information is scattered, or the flow depends on manual steps. The diagnosis detects those points even when tools already exist.

Does the diagnosis always end in AI?

+

No. The diagnosis can end in AI, automation, software, integration, a process change, or a combination. The technology is chosen based on the problem, not the other way around.

Tell us how the process works today or what problem you're seeing

We can help you understand where it makes sense to intervene.

Want to evaluate your case?

Request a free initial assessment and we'll get back to you to understand where to start.

Message on WhatsApp